The Truth Hidden by the Spectacle of the Washing of the Feet. A Homily of Pope Benedict

(s.m.) On the calen­dar relea­sed by the Vatican at the end of March for the Paschal cele­bra­tions this year, the Mass “in coe­na Domini” on the eve­ning of Holy Thursday was mis­sing enti­re­ly.

Since Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been pope, it has always hap­pe­ned like this. Only at the last moment was it made kno­wn whe­re he would cele­bra­te, usual­ly at a pri­son. And the news con­cer­ned not so much the Mass, but the washing of the feet that he would do for twel­ve pri­so­ners or immi­gran­ts, men and women, Christians, Muslims, with or without faith.

The homi­lies too, given in the­se cir­cum­stan­ces by Pope Francis, were whol­ly in kee­ping with the abso­lu­te prio­ri­ty given to the washing of the feet. They were of few words, impro­vi­sed, almo­st always and only redu­ced to an exhor­ta­tion to for­gi­ve­ness and fra­ter­nal ser­vi­ce.

As for the Mass, the­re was usual­ly not even a men­tion. And yet that of Holy Thursday is a cor­ner­sto­ne of the Christian litur­gy, the memo­rial of the Last Supper of Jesus with the apo­stles (in the illu­stra­tion, a detail fre­scoed by Giotto in 1303), the fir­st of all the Masses of yester­day, today, and tomor­row.

This year too, with Francis in pre­ca­rious health con­di­tions, gene­ral expec­ta­tions were con­cen­tra­ted on who in his pla­ce would per­form the washing of the feet, and whe­re – with a sub­sti­tu­tion that in the end was drop­ped – and abo­ve all on the pos­si­ble, flee­ting appea­ran­ce on the sce­ne of the pope him­self, perhaps with a visit to the near­by Roman pri­son of Regina Coeli.

But why not instead bring back to light what the meta­mor­pho­sis of Holy Thursday car­ried out by the cur­rent pon­tiff has con­cea­led? Why not return to the authen­tic heart of the Mass “in coe­na Domini”?

The fol­lo­wing is the homi­ly given at the Mass of Holy Thursday in 2008 by Pope Benedict XVI, who always cele­bra­ted it at the cathe­dral of St. John Lateran.

The homi­ly is inspi­red by the page of the Gospel of John that is read at this Mass, whe­re instead of the account of the Last Supper the­re is pre­ci­se­ly that of Jesus washing the feet of his apo­stles. But what Pope Benedict dra­ws from this is of no com­pa­ri­son to the super­fi­cia­li­ty of the spec­ta­cle in vogue for years.

That homi­le­tics was a high point of Joseph Ratzinger’s pon­ti­fi­ca­te is a judg­ment shared by many. And Settimo Cielo has alrea­dy explai­ned why, in the intro­duc­tion to a book that in 2008, for the fir­st time, col­lec­ted a year of litur­gi­cal pre­a­ching by that pope.

This homi­ly is shi­ning proof of that. Happy rea­ding, and Happy Easter!

*

Homily of the Mass “in coena Domini” of March 20, 2008

by Benedict XVI

Dear Brothers and Sisters, St John begins his account of how Jesus washed his disci­ples’ feet with an espe­cial­ly solemn, almo­st litur­gi­cal lan­gua­ge. “Before the fea­st of the Passover, when Jesus knew that his hour had come to depart out of this world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end” (Jn 13:1).

Jesus’ “hour”, to which all his work had been direc­ted sin­ce the outset, had come. John used two words to descri­be what con­sti­tu­tes the con­tent of this hour: pas­sa­ge (meta­bai­nein, meta­ba­sis) and aga­pe — love. The two words are mutual­ly expla­na­to­ry; they both descri­be the Pasch of Jesus: the Cross and the Resurrection, the Crucifixion as an uplif­ting, a “pas­sa­ge” to God’s glo­ry, a “pas­sing” from the world to the Father. It is not as thou­gh after pay­ing the world a brief visit, Jesus now sim­ply departs and returns to the Father. The pas­sa­ge is a tran­sfor­ma­tion. He brings with him his flesh, his being as a man. On the Cross, in giving him­self, he is as it were fused and tran­sfor­med into a new way of being, in which he is now always with the Father and con­tem­po­ra­neou­sly with human­kind. He tran­sforms the Cross, the act of kil­ling, into an act of giving, of love to the end.

With this expres­sion “to the end”, John anti­ci­pa­tes Jesus’ last words on the Cross: eve­ry­thing has been accom­pli­shed, “It is fini­shed” (Jn 19:30). Through Jesus’ love the Cross beco­mes meta­ba­sis, a tran­sfor­ma­tion from being human into being a sharer in God’s glo­ry. He invol­ves us all in this tran­sfor­ma­tion, dra­wing us into the tran­sfor­ming power of his love to the point that, in our being with him, our life beco­mes a “pas­sa­ge”, a tran­sfor­ma­tion. Thus, we recei­ve redemp­tion, beco­ming share­rs in eter­nal love, a con­di­tion for which we stri­ve throu­ghout our life.

This essen­tial pro­cess of Jesus’ hour is por­trayed in the washing of the feet in a sort of pro­phe­tic and sym­bo­lic act.

In it, Jesus highlights with a con­cre­te gestu­re pre­ci­se­ly what the great Christological hymn in the Letter to the Philippians descri­bes as the con­tent of Christ’s myste­ry. Jesus lays down the clo­thes of his glo­ry, he wraps around his wai­st the towel of huma­ni­ty and makes him­self a ser­vant. He washes the disci­ples’ dir­ty feet and thus gives them access to the divi­ne ban­quet to which he invi­tes them.

The devo­tio­nal and exter­nal puri­fi­ca­tions puri­fy man ritual­ly but lea­ve him as he is repla­ced by a new bathing: Jesus puri­fies us throu­gh his Word and his Love, throu­gh the gift of him­self. “You are alrea­dy made clean by the word which I have spo­ken to you”, he was to say to his disci­ples in the discour­se on the vine (Jn 15:3).

Over and over again he washes us with his Word. Yes, if we accept Jesus’ words in an atti­tu­de of medi­ta­tion, prayer and faith, they deve­lop in us their puri­fy­ing power. Day after today we are as it were cove­red by many forms of dirt, emp­ty words, pre­ju­di­ces, redu­ced and alte­red wisdom; a multi-facetted semi-falsity or fal­si­ty con­stan­tly infil­tra­tes deep within us. All this clouds and con­ta­mi­na­tes our souls, threa­tens us with an inca­pa­ci­ty for truth and the good. If we recei­ve Jesus’ words with an atten­ti­ve heart they pro­ve to be tru­ly clean­sing, puri­fi­ca­tions of the soul, of the inner man.

The Gospel of the washing of the feet invi­tes us to this, to allow our­sel­ves to be washed anew by this pure water, to allow our­sel­ves to be made capa­ble of con­vi­vial com­mu­nion with God and with our bro­thers and sisters. However, when Jesus was pier­ced by the soldier’s spear, it was not only water that flo­wed from his side but also blood (Jn 19:34; cf. 1 Jn 5:6–8). Jesus has not only spo­ken; he has not left us only words. He gives us him­self. He washes us with the sacred power of his Blood, that is, with his gift of him­self “to the end”, to the Cross. His word is more than mere speech; it is flesh and blood “for the life of the world” (Jn 6:51).

In the holy sacra­men­ts, the Lord kneels ever anew at our feet and puri­fies us. Let us pray to him that we may be ever more pro­found­ly pene­tra­ted by the sacred clean­sing of his love and the­re­by tru­ly puri­fied!

If we listen atten­ti­ve­ly to the Gospel, we can discern two dif­fe­rent dimen­sions in the event of the washing of the feet. The clean­sing that Jesus offers his disci­ples is fir­st and fore­mo­st sim­ply his action — the gift of puri­ty, of the “capa­ci­ty for God” that is offe­red to them. But the gift then beco­mes a model, the duty to do the same for one ano­ther.

The Fathers have descri­bed the­se two aspec­ts of the washing of the feet with the words sacra­men­tum and exem­plum. Sacramentum in this con­text does not mean one of the seven sacra­men­ts but the myste­ry of Christ in its enti­re­ty, from the Incarnation to the Cross and the Resurrection: all of this beco­mes the hea­ling and sanc­ti­fy­ing power, the tran­sfor­ming for­ce for men and women, it beco­mes our meta­ba­sis, our tran­sfor­ma­tion into a new form of being, into open­ness for God and com­mu­nion with him.

But this new being which, without our merit, he sim­ply gives to us must then be tran­sfor­med within us into the dyna­mic of a new life. The gift and exam­ple ove­rall, which we find in the pas­sa­ge on the washing of the feet, is a cha­rac­te­ri­stic of the natu­re of Christianity in gene­ral. Christianity is not a type of mora­li­sm, sim­ply a system of ethics. It does not ori­gi­na­te in our action, our moral capa­ci­ty. Christianity is fir­st and fore­mo­st a gift: God gives him­self to us — he does not give some­thing, but him­self. And this does not only hap­pen at the begin­ning, at the moment of our con­ver­sion. He con­stan­tly remains the One who gives. He con­ti­nual­ly offers us his gif­ts. He always pre­ce­des us. This is why the cen­tral act of Christian being is the Eucharist: gra­ti­tu­de for having been gra­ti­fied, joy for the new life that he gives us.

Yet with this, we do not remain pas­si­ve reci­pien­ts of divi­ne good­ness. God gra­ti­fies us as per­so­nal, living part­ners. Love given is the dyna­mic of “loving toge­ther”, it wan­ts to be new life in us star­ting from God. Thus, we under­stand the words which, at the end of the washing of the feet, Jesus addres­ses to his disci­ples and to us all: “A new com­mand­ment I give to you, that you love one ano­ther; even as I have loved you, that you also love one ano­ther” (Jn 13:34). The “new com­mand­ment” does not con­si­st in a new and dif­fi­cult norm that did not exi­st until then. The new thing is the gift that intro­du­ces us into Christ’s men­ta­li­ty. The new com­mand­ment con­sists in loving toge­ther with him who fir­st loved us.

So too must we under­stand the Sermon on the Mount. This does not mean that at that time Jesus gave new pre­cep­ts, which repre­sen­ted the demands of a huma­ni­sm more subli­me than that befo­re. The Sermon on the Mount is a jour­ney of trai­ning in iden­ti­fy­ing with the sen­ti­men­ts of Christ (cf. Phil 2:5), a jour­ney of inte­rior puri­fi­ca­tion that leads us to living toge­ther with him. The new thing is the gift that ushers us into the men­ta­li­ty of Christ. If we con­si­der this, we per­cei­ve how far our lives often are from this new­ness of the New Testament and how lit­tle we give huma­ni­ty the exam­ple of loving in com­mu­nion with his love. Thus, we remain indeb­ted to the proof of cre­di­bi­li­ty of the Christian truth which is revea­led in love. For this very rea­son we want to pray to the Lord increa­sin­gly to make us, throu­gh his puri­fi­ca­tion, matu­re per­sons of the new com­mand­ment.

In the Gospel of the washing of the feet, Jesus’ con­ver­sa­tion with Peter pre­sen­ts to us yet ano­ther detail of the pra­xis of Christian life to which we would like final­ly to turn our atten­tion.

At fir­st, Peter did not want to let the Lord wash his feet: this rever­sal of order, that is, that the master — Jesus — should wash feet, that the master should car­ry out the slave’s ser­vi­ce, con­tra­sted star­kly with his reve­ren­tial respect for Jesus, with his con­cept of the rela­tion­ship bet­ween the tea­cher and the disci­ple. “You shall never wash my feet”, he said to Jesus with his usual impe­tuo­si­ty (Jn 13:8). It is the same men­ta­li­ty that, after the pro­fes­sion of faith in Jesus, Son of God, in Caesarea Philippi, had dri­ven him to oppo­se him when he had fore­told his con­dem­na­tion and the cross: “This shall never hap­pen to you!”, Peter had decla­red cate­go­ri­cal­ly (Mt 16:22).    His con­cept of the Messiah invol­ved an ima­ge of maje­sty, of divi­ne gran­deur. He had to learn repea­ted­ly that God’s great­ness is dif­fe­rent from our idea of great­ness; that it con­sists pre­ci­se­ly in stoo­ping low, in the humi­li­ty of ser­vi­ce, in the radi­ca­li­sm of love even to total self-emptying. And we too must learn it anew becau­se we syste­ma­ti­cal­ly desi­re a God of suc­cess and not of the Passion; becau­se we are una­ble to rea­li­ze that the Pastor comes as a Lamb that gives itself and thus leads us to the right pastu­re.

When the Lord tells Peter that without the washing of the feet he would not be able to have any part in him, Peter imme­dia­te­ly asks impe­tuou­sly that his head and hands be washed. This is fol­lo­wed by Jesus’ myste­rious say­ing: “He who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet” (Jn 13:10). Jesus was allu­ding to a clean­sing with which the disci­ples had alrea­dy com­plied; for their par­ti­ci­pa­tion in the ban­quet, only the washing of their feet was now requi­red. But of cour­se this con­ceals a more pro­found mea­ning. What was Jesus allu­ding to? We do not know for cer­tain. In any case, let us bear in mind that the washing of the feet, in accor­dan­ce with the mea­ning of the who­le chap­ter, does not point to any sin­gle spe­ci­fic sacra­ment but the sacra­men­tum Christi in its enti­re­ty — his ser­vi­ce of sal­va­tion, his descent even to the Cross, his love to the end that puri­fies us and makes us capa­ble of God.

Yet here, with the distinc­tion bet­ween bathing and the washing of the feet, an allu­sion to life in the com­mu­ni­ty of the disci­ples also beco­mes per­cep­ti­ble, an allu­sion to the life of the Church – an allu­sion that John may deli­be­ra­te­ly mean to tran­smit to the com­mu­ni­ties of his time. It then seems clear that the bathing that puri­fies us once and for all and must not be repea­ted is Baptism — being immer­sed in the death and Resurrection of Christ, a fact that pro­found­ly chan­ges our life, giving us as it were a new iden­ti­ty that lasts, if we do not reject it as Judas did.

However, even in the per­ma­nen­ce of this new iden­ti­ty, given by Baptism, for con­vi­vial com­mu­nion with Jesus we need the “washing of the feet”. What does this invol­ve? It seems to me that the First Letter of St John gives us the key to under­stan­ding it. In it we read: “If we say we have no sin, we decei­ve our­sel­ves, and the truth is not in us. If we con­fess our sins, he is fai­th­ful and just, and will for­gi­ve our sins and clean­se us from all unrighteou­sness” (1 Jn 1:8ff.). We are in need of the “washing of the feet”, the clean­sing of our dai­ly sins, and for this rea­son we need to con­fess our sins.

Just how this took pla­ce in the Johannine com­mu­ni­ties we do not know. But the direc­tion indi­ca­ted by Jesus’ word to Peter is obvious: to be able to par­ti­ci­pa­te in the con­vi­vial com­mu­ni­ty with Jesus Christ we must be sin­ce­re. We have to reco­gni­ze that we sin, even in our new iden­ti­ty as bap­ti­zed per­sons. We need con­fes­sion in the form it has taken in the Sacrament of Reconciliation. In it the Lord washes our dir­ty feet ever anew and we can be sea­ted at table with him.

But in this way the word with which the Lord extends the sacra­men­tum, making it the exem­plum, a gift, a ser­vi­ce for one’s bro­ther, also acqui­res new mea­ning: “If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet” (Jn 13:14). We must wash one another’s feet in the mutual dai­ly ser­vi­ce of love. But we must also wash one another’s feet in the sen­se that we must for­gi­ve one ano­ther ever anew. The debt for which the Lord has par­do­ned us is always infi­ni­te­ly grea­ter than all the deb­ts that others can owe us (cf. Mt 18:21–35). Holy Thursday exhorts us to this: not to allow resent­ment toward others to beco­me a poi­son in the dep­ths of the soul. It urges us to puri­fy our memo­ry con­stan­tly, for­gi­ving one ano­ther whole-heartedly, washing one another’s feet, to be able to go to God’s ban­quet toge­ther.

Holy Thursday is a day of gra­ti­tu­de and joy for the great gift of love to the end that the Lord has made to us. Let us pray to the Lord at this hour, so that gra­ti­tu­de and joy may beco­me in us the power to love toge­ther with his love. Amen.

© Copyright 2008 — Libreria Editrice Vaticana

————

Sandro Magister is past “vati­ca­ni­sta” of the Italian wee­kly L’Espresso.
The late­st arti­cles in English of his blog Settimo Cielo are on this page.
But the full archi­ve of Settimo Cielo in English, from 2017 to today, is acces­si­ble.
As is the com­ple­te index of the blog www.chiesa, which pre­ce­ded it.

Share Button