Synodality Contradicted by the Facts. The War Diary of the Syro-Malabar Church

In the span of a few weeks, Pope Francis has pro­mo­ted from ordi­na­ry prie­st to bishop, to car­di­nal, and final­ly to pre­fect of the dica­ste­ry for inter­re­li­gious dia­lo­gue the Indian George Jacob Koovakad, 51, for four years – and also in the futu­re – the orga­ni­zer of his trips around the world.

Fortunately, howe­ver, the new­ly elect will only have to deal with dia­lo­gue “ad extra,” with other reli­gions, becau­se with regard to dia­lo­gue “ad intra” he comes from a Church that could not be more divi­ded, in fron­tal oppo­si­tion even to the pope.

Koovakad belongs to the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, with four and a half mil­lion fai­th­ful mostly resi­ding in sou­thern India, in the State of Kerala, whe­re he was ordai­ned bishop last November 24. It is a Church who­se ori­gins date back to the fir­st cen­tu­ries, with its foun­der the apo­stle Thomas who­se tomb is vene­ra­ted in Chennai, of Syro-Oriental linea­ge, with self-government on the syno­dal model and with its own Eucharistic litur­gy, inclu­ding the very ancient ana­pho­ra of Addai and Mari, which is the only one not to inclu­de the words of Jesus over the bread and wine offe­red as his body and blood.

Starting in the six­teenth cen­tu­ry, after the arri­val of the Portuguese in India, the Syro-Malabar Church was stron­gly Latinized, except for the reco­ve­ry in the last cen­tu­ry, befo­re and after Vatican Council II, of some of its ance­stral trai­ts. One of the­se con­cerns the posi­tion of the cele­bran­ts during the “Qurbana,” the Mass. In 2021, the synod of the who­le Syro-Malabar Church defi­ni­ti­ve­ly and una­ni­mou­sly esta­bli­shed that the cele­bran­ts must face the peo­ple during the litur­gy of the word and the final bles­sing, but have their backs to the peo­ple and face the altar during the litur­gy of the Eucharist.

And from the­re the scuf­fle bro­ke out. Because almo­st all the priests of the popu­lous pri­ma­tial see, the arche­par­chy of Ernakulam-Angamalay, diso­beyed the order and per­si­sted in cele­bra­ting the who­le Mass facing the peo­ple. Left to defend what the synod had esta­bli­shed, almo­st on their own, were the major arch­bi­shop of the arche­par­chy, Cardinal George Alencherry, alrea­dy disli­ked by the peo­ple and facing stiff oppo­si­tion on enti­re­ly dif­fe­rent mat­ters finan­cial in natu­re, and his papal­ly appoin­ted apo­sto­lic admi­ni­stra­tor, Archbishop Andrews Thazhath, who was also pre­si­dent of the bishops’ con­fe­ren­ce of India.

The cli­ma­te was so hea­ted that Thazhath had to get poli­ce pro­tec­tion to cele­bra­te Mass, rival fac­tions cla­shed phy­si­cal­ly even insi­de chur­ches, and in Ernakulam St. Mary’s Cathedral itself had to stay clo­sed for mon­ths.

But mea­n­whi­le, in Rome, Francis had set in motion the synod on syno­da­li­ty, with the decla­red inten­tion of con­for­ming the who­le Church to this col­le­gial model of gover­nan­ce. And so the pope was fore­mo­st in wan­ting the norm of the Syro-Malabar synod of 2021 to be respec­ted.

In the sum­mer of 2023, to resol­ve the dispu­te, the pope sent as his dele­ga­te to that rebel­lious land an expert on the mat­ter, the Jesuit Cyril Vasil, arch­bi­shop of the Greek-Catholic epar­chy of Kosice in Slovakia and pre­viou­sly the secre­ta­ry of the dica­ste­ry for the Eastern Churches.

Vasil arri­ved in Ernakulam on August 4 hol­ding a mes­sa­ge from the pope that asked for obe­dien­ce from the fai­th­ful. But he nei­ther mana­ged to have this mes­sa­ge read in all the chur­ches, nor did he him­self mana­ge to enter the cathe­dral without poli­ce pro­tec­tion. The alter­na­ti­ve he was pro­po­sing did not admit of any sort of media­tion, which indeed had been attemp­ted by a han­d­ful of bishops and priests in the region. According to him one obeyed either the pope, and the­re­fo­re the deci­sions of the synod, or the “trou­ble­ma­kers who lead to per­di­tion.” In the end they let fly at him with insul­ts and eggs.

But even after the fai­lu­re of Vasil’s expe­di­tion, Francis did not bend. In ear­ly December 2023 he accep­ted the resi­gna­tion of the con­te­sted car­di­nal Alencherry and of his right-hand man, Thazhath, but addres­sed a video mes­sa­ge to the Syro-Malabar fai­th­ful, also trans­la­ted into Malayalam, the local lan­gua­ge, which again asked for abso­lu­te obe­dien­ce, the only alter­na­ti­ve to which was schi­sm:

“You are chur­ches, do not beco­me a sect. Do not for­ce the com­pe­tent eccle­sia­stic Authority to ack­no­w­led­ge you as having left the Church becau­se you are no lon­ger in com­mu­nion with your Pastors and with the Successor of the Apostle Peter.”

But not even after this video mes­sa­ge did the pope obtain obe­dien­ce. In January he appoin­ted the new major arch­bi­shop of the Syro-Malabar Church in the per­son of Raphael Thattil, with Bosco Puthur as apo­sto­lic admi­ni­stra­tor.

And on May 13, 2024, recei­ving in audien­ce in Rome the Syro-Malabar bishops with a lar­ge repre­sen­ta­tion of the fai­th­ful, Francis once again tried to con­vin­ce the rebels to obey.

To ingra­tia­te him­self with them he offe­red the Syro-Malabar Church, in a sur­pri­se move, a new role of inter­na­tio­nal impor­tan­ce: that of taking care of all the migran­ts, hun­dreds of thou­sands, who have left Kerala to work in the Arab sta­tes of the Gulf, “so that your great litur­gi­cal, theo­lo­gi­cal, spi­ri­tual and cul­tu­ral heri­ta­ge may shi­ne ever more brightly.” And he urged them to take action “as of today,” even befo­re such juri­sdic­tion was cano­ni­cal­ly con­fir­med “in wri­ting,” which none­the­less had to be reque­sted and obtai­ned from the Vatican.

But then Francis again insi­sted on what was wei­ghing on him: “Showing a gra­ve lack of respect for the Blessed Sacrament – the Sacrament of cha­ri­ty and uni­ty – by arguing about the details of how to cele­bra­te the Eucharist, the pin­na­cle of his pre­sen­ce among us, is incom­pa­ti­ble with the Christian faith. […] It is here that the devil, the divi­der, who tru­ly exists, creeps in and thwarts the most heart­felt desi­re that the Lord expres­sed befo­re dying for us: that we, his disci­ples, be ‘one’ (Jn 17:21), without divi­sion and without brea­king com­mu­nion.”

In June, the new major arch­bi­shop of the Syro-Malabar Church addres­sed a cir­cu­lar to the cler­gy and fai­th­ful with the ulti­ma­ti­ve reque­st that they obey the reso­lu­tions of the 2021 synod.

The cir­cu­lar was sup­po­sed to be read in all the chur­ches, but only in a very few was this done. From July 3, the dead­li­ne of the ulti­ma­tum, priests who did not obey would be excom­mu­ni­ca­ted. But in fact the cir­cu­lar was open­ly bur­ned or thro­wn in the trash, with resoun­ding pro­tests. And five bishops from nei­gh­bo­ring dio­ce­ses, in a let­ter to the major arch­bi­shop, also took a stand again­st the excom­mu­ni­ca­tion threa­te­ned for the diso­be­dient, when instead – they wro­te – “Pope Francis should have been hee­ded,” when at the audien­ce of May 13 “he told us that the pro­blem should be sol­ved by our­sel­ves in the synod” and not with a soli­ta­ry injunc­tion from abo­ve.

In effect, on July 1 the synod of the Syro-Malabar Church mana­ged to issue a pro­po­sal of agree­ment valid for all of its 36 dio­ce­ses, accor­ding to which, star­ting from July 3, which is also the fea­st of St. Thomas the Apostle, eve­ry Sunday Mass would be cele­bra­ted accor­ding to the rules of the 2021 synod, whi­le on all other days it could be cele­bra­ted facing the peo­ple.

But not even this com­pro­mi­se was able to quell the rebel­lion, to which was added a stri­ke by the archeparchy’s curia offi­cials over the unre­sol­ved after­math of the admi­ni­stra­ti­ve misdeeds of the past years.

This stri­ke, com­ple­te with the occu­pa­tion of the offi­ces in the curia, got a respon­se from the arch­bi­shop in October with a chan­ge of direc­tors of the various offi­ces. But this fue­led fur­ther pro­tests, espe­cial­ly over the pro­mo­tion to chan­cel­lor of Joshy Puthuva, for­mer admi­ni­stra­ti­ve arm of Cardinal Alencherry, con­si­de­red the main cul­prit of tho­se scams.

The fact is that about 300 priests of the arche­par­chy gathe­red in the cathe­dral to con­demn the new appoint­men­ts, all assi­gned, they said, to peo­ple hosti­le to the cele­bra­tion of Mass facing to the peo­ple.

The one who was con­te­sted, more than the arch­bi­shop, was the apo­sto­lic admi­ni­stra­tor Bosco Puthur. “He is a dic­ta­tor,” said a lea­der of the rebels, the prie­st Kuriakose Mundadan, secre­ta­ry of the pre­sby­te­ral coun­cil of the arche­par­chy. A cir­cu­lar let­ter from Puthur issued in ear­ly November, which orde­red new priests to obey the 2021 norms and the others to at lea­st adhe­re to the com­pro­mi­se solu­tion of July 1, 2024, was torn up and set on fire in front of the doors of many chur­ches (see pho­to).

In the fol­lo­wing weeks, priests thought to be affi­lia­ted with the arch­bi­shop and the apo­sto­lic admi­ni­stra­tor were pre­ven­ted from ente­ring their respec­ti­ve chur­ches, with the con­se­quent coun­te­rat­tack by their fol­lo­wers, who stor­med the very chur­ches to take pos­ses­sion of them.

In ear­ly January this year, 21 priests even occu­pied the arche­par­chy buil­ding for a few hours. And the prie­st Joyce Kaithakottil went on a three-day hun­ger stri­ke near St. George’s Cathedral in Angamalay, in sup­port of the Mass being cele­bra­ted enti­re­ly facing the peo­ple.

The synod of the Syro-Malabar Church con­dem­ned both of the­se actions. But this time too without being hee­ded, as alrea­dy hap­pe­ned for the litur­gi­cal reso­lu­tions of 2021 and 2024.

In short, that syno­da­li­ty so much urged by Pope Francis as the cure-all of the Church, when put to the test of fac­ts can also fail disa­strou­sly.

(Translated by Matthew Sherry: traduttore@hotmail.com)

————

Sandro Magister is past “vati­ca­ni­sta” of the Italian wee­kly L’Espresso.
The late­st arti­cles in English of his blog Settimo Cielo are on this page.
But the full archi­ve of Settimo Cielo in English, from 2017 to today, is acces­si­ble.
As is the com­ple­te index of the blog www.chiesa, which pre­ce­ded it.

Share Button